 | | Re: New newsgroups for product line years
|
|
(...) When cross-posting, is there any preference on whether to direct followup-to into or out-of the .year hierarchy? I'd say if a message should be cross-posted with .year.* and .elsewhere, the followup-to should go into .year.*. Generally (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: New newsgroups for product line years
|
|
Todd, Heh, I wish I was able to subscribe to lugnet.year.* in one fell swoop, not have to click on 70-some groups... (yes, even through the multi-group interface...). Or, better yet, to subscribe to lugnet.year as read only, and get all the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | New newsgroups for product line years
|
|
A new newsgroup hierarchy for focused discussion of product line years has been created. Many thanks to Frank Filz for coming up with this idea several months ago. As information about the upcoming 2001 product line becomes available, please feel (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.admin.nntp) !
|
| |
| | Re: TechQuestions
|
|
(...) (URL) => (URL) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: TechQuestions
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Ehhh, sorry for lacking knowledge here, but wat is INN? /Joakim (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: TechQuestions
|
|
(...) It's called "C News" (chosen over INN for its small memory footprint, which is important when having lots of simultaneous connections). (...) No, it's a bunch of CGI scripts in Perl. --Todd (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | TechQuestions
|
|
Hi Todd! What kind of nntp server is LUGNET running? Is it an applet of some kind that hooks on to the nntp to create those wonderfull threads in the web-interface? If it is an applet, where can i get one ;-) ? -- Joakim jocke@arjay.nu (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Firewalled, I think...And when I tried using Netscape to use this SMTP server, I couldn't eeven sendd out... (...) Yeep, but not outside our collection of servers for telnet, other than that, I don't think so. (24 years ago, 15-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: change of address
|
|
(...) Yes, the news-by-mail associations are paired with email addresses. --Todd (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Hey y'all, I got me a shop on B-Bay - Trains, ya know
|
|
(...) my (...) fanatic. (...) I think your threading is broken... unless you deliberately started a new thread. What mailer or poster are you using? (cross posted to admin.nntp but left FUT to market.bst) To your point, I guess what i am saying is (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: change of address
|
|
(...) Having just unsubscribed all the IDs I could find (1), I think the answer is yes, that is, that subscriptions are tracked by email address, not member. Makes sense in that the use of the confirmation code (sent to tne email address) associated (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | change of address
|
|
I just noticed, that even though I updated my member profile, the newsgroups are still being sent to my old email address? do I actually have to unsubscribe/resubscribe? (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Are you able to change your SMTP server, or are you forced by a firewall to use that one? Also, are you able to use telnet or ssh? (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) control. (...) no (...) Correction...What I meant was that most/all companies have no need to allow employees access to the internet. Maybe some want to try and entice people using the internet to buy their products by having a website, but (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... <snippedysnippy'o machine> (...) is (...) Could you please explain furter why this is neccesary? As a consultant in the business for 10 years I really have not found any evidents of trouth in this statement. (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) It was a socratic question. The point was that you certainly do have control over whether your messages appear threaded. (...) Already answered. RTRFC. (...) I meant that nothing on the lugnet.com server is preventing you from posting from (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) As he just said, it's for e-mail *and* news. (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Just a suggestion...look at the email address it came through...The threaded ones are done on the web view at home, while the others are through email at work. (...) I'll have a look when and if I ever get time. (...) But what about SMTP [I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Beg all you want. You can't deny responsibility. You've been told what not to do, if you persist in doing it, you're responsible. Therefore you have control. (...) No company "has little or no need to use the internet". Not if it wants to (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) How would you explain that your message just now (which I'm replying to) appears properly threaded? (...) Actually, it is. See RFC822 "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages" and RFC1138, RFC1148, RFC1327 and RFC2156. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
