Subject:
|
Re: Almost there...almost there... :-,
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 May 2000 15:20:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
131 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> > In slightly unrelated news, I *really* need a small-ish catchy name for this
> > app, and I frankly can't come up with anything decent. I am
> > eagerly entertaining suggestions. "Lugnetreader" is my preference, but it's
> > taken. (2) Would Java Lugnetreader ruffle any feathers? Dan?
>
> Hmm. Well, hmm, I think there some things to bear in mind... First, LUGNET
> and JAVA are trademarks, so I think you'll want to seek permission to use
> those before releasing a software package with one of those in the title.
> Second, it's possible (although I haven't looked at the code in-depth to
> confirm) that your reader might actually not be LUGNET-pecific. LUGNET is a
> community based on a software package in development with a current working
> title of "Fibblesnork" (but that name isn't written in stone). If/when all
> or parts of underlying software is released, it may go out under that name
> or a different name (but in any case it definitely wouldn't go out under the
> LUGNET name).
ok, I'll ask for myself then - is it ok if I do call it LugnetReader? Since it's
currently very lugnet specific, and I have no plans of expanding it further?
It _can_ be done, just needs the nntp interface module written for it... But
I've no interest in that.
Should I look for another name?
:)
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Almost there...almost there... :-,
|
| (...) Cool!!! (...) Well, cookies are an HTTP thing. If your client is posting articles, I think you'll find NTTP to be much simpler and cleaner for that. :-) All the HTTP posting mechanism does is opens up a single-use temporary NNTP session from (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
