|
|
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Oh, won't someone please think of the children?!? This is the same panic-driven slippery-slope reasoning that is used to justify all kinds of anti-gay action, so it's fitting that it should pop up here as well. It's pointless scaremongering to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) I disagree. To attempt NOT to create a community, you can't really have post-to-able boards, but instead something more like MOCpages or BrickShelf where there's room to post Lego creations, but no back-and-forth communication. Hence, asking (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| In lugnet.admin.nntp, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) However, if certain people are uncomfortable posting in .general groups, or certain people are uncomfortable reading about certain things in .general groups, shouldn't there be sub groups made to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Well, maybe it should be. (...) Maybe the purpose of LUGNET shouldn't be to create a community, but rather be a resource center for all things pertaining to LEGO. Boards are useful for communication among AFOLs, and many AFOLs have come to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Is it truly an irrelevant detail? If it was, wouldn't that NOT create discrimination? True, on a day to day basis, for the most part, we don't care if any individual is LGBT, married, single, straight, young, old, or whatever. But Lugnet is (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
