Subject:
|
Re: Brickbay?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:58:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
379 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kenneth Wright writes:
...
> Clearly? Yes, but only now that the preceding posts have brought it to my
> attention. If you go to the main page, you will see that of the 6 choices
> offered under MARKET, the best of them was picked. Now, if you could click
> on MARKET from the main page and open up the sub-catagories, it then would
> have been clear where we needed to post. In other words, it appears there
> are only 6 sub-catagories for MARKET. I for one was not aware of this other
> sub-catagory, despite my effort to post in the most appropriate location.
This is odd. What is the URL for the page that shows only 6 sub-catagories?
When I go to: http://news.lugnet.com/market/ I see nine catagories. Since
.brickshops, .appraisal and .theory are relatively new, is it possible that
you're looking at a cached version of the page (i.e., does refreshing the
page fix it)? Or are you looking at some other page?
...
> To Cary: Thank you
...
You're welcome. I appreciate your assessment of the situation.
When I post, I try to remember that:
- Not every reader knows the history of LUGNET in detail.
- Some users have a limited command of English.
- Some users are ten years old.
- (Almost) no one enjoys reading hostility, veiled or unveiled.
Sometimes I blow it. (See, there's an English idiom right there.) But I have
hope that LUGNET may be viewed as the friendliest place on the Internet for
a future generation of LEGO builders.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickbay?
|
| (...) This is where I goofed: I started from the LUGNET main page (www.lugnet.com), looking for information regarding BrickBay's server being down. Scrolling down, under MARKET, I saw "Buy/Sell" as one of only 6 choices, and it seemed to make the (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickbay?
|
| (...) I don't think anyone was being, or needed to be, apologetic. It seemed more of a rare case of being quite polite, especially when the offending parties clearly did not intentionally, and quite understandably, misdirect their posts. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
