 | | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) LUGNET doesn't generate enough funds to support itself. Todd and I carry the hosting, etc. and none of us see any money for what we do. All time is volunteered. Donations are always welcome and very appreciated. Which reminds me: currently, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I have to agree, I've sent Dan a few updates for the information on LUGNET DB and the info was updated within hours (in most cases within minutes!). Great job! Congratulations! - David (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Well I've been dinged in the past for suggesting how to implement things, but I'll venture to offer that an enhancement request tracker doesn't have to be NEW code and doesn't have to be done HERE. Sourceforge has a pretty good one, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) I too would like to take the moment to exclaim me too. :-, Perhaps a "me too" checkbox would be in order too (just kidding :-) (...) This would be really keen and everything, but it really depends on two things: the capability of the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) That's what I've heard. :-, At any rate, best wishes to Steve, Jenn, and Dan -- it's quite the chore but it must be rewarding too. Cheers, - jsproat (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Are you OK with an avalanche of "me too" posts like this one? Either that or maybe an enhancement tracker would be nice to have. (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | A little function I would like to see.
|
|
Ok, I hope this does not start an avalance of requests but I just thought that with all the new admins that I would make a small function request that I would like to be able to take advantage of. I would love to be able to define a sig (signature (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev (and 1 other group), Bram Lambrecht wrote: \> > heh, yah - put it on the member page under activity, or (...) heh, yah - except there are a lot of other things that need doing more :) *grin* Dan (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) It's just a SMOP(1) after all. But where is it on the priority list? In fact, can we SEE the priority list? Or even dynamically change it by voting for what changes we think are important? That would be neat. (although that too would require (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Hey, now that you're an admin, this is within your power, isn't it? :) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) Duane, Thanks for pointing out exactly where I was going with my argument. He screwed up and got shot down for the language abuse. We can remember the lesson, move on, and all be better for it. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Then you'd be wrong. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) WOOHOO!!!! Not THAT would be a useful item here at LUGNET. Far better than Brickshelf's instructions database that is updated through 1997. Knowing what parts are in sets helps me decide what to buy and I know I'm not the only one who uses (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
We're also very happy to be on the team, and are very excited to be here. I hope y'all will be patient with us, since it will take a while to understand the code for LUGNET, which is a huge project. :) Dan (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Well, I'd rather not speak for Steve, but I can point you in some directions about him, specifically: (URL) for Dan and myself, let's see... We've been DB admins for the LUGNET Guide since June of 2000, we run (URL) (including the peeron inventories (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Congrats on the new positions. eric (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Welcome and congrats. For some of us folks who are a little rusty on our LUGNET history, maybe introductions/backgrounds from Steve, Dan, and Jennifer might be nice... what do you say, guys? Again, congrats! - Steve (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I think that's on a to-do list somewhere. :) Jennifer (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) I think that there is a distinction, however small, between JAL's post and Matt's post. I don't want to get in to that though - I don't feel that it's constructive. The thing about Matt's post that I find offensive is the subject line. A (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) The good news is you're not bitter about it. :-) Why don't we move on... Jude (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
