 | | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) A fool would think that you had, yes, but Todd has repeatedly stated here in admin general that he does not make editorial decisions. Which you would know if you read this group. I expect Suzanne to continue that wise policy. You would need to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) Nope. I started this sub-thread. I instigated it. This is in l.a.g as someone is trying to rub me up the wrong way (I expect that is clear to everyone). I am yet to be convinced that I was off-topic. But, if we are blowing the dust of the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) Even a fool can see that I have given her the authority to do so if she thinks they were off-topic. (...) That is why I said "if that can be done" (...) No, what I said was this: "If Suzanne reads my posts and thinks they are off-topic, she is (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GLAHKt.C9B@lugnet.com... (...) post. (...) opinion). (...) and insensitive to the tragedy which occured within a mile of LD, you spin this to make it look like John was the instigator. If you (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) It is against LUGNET policy to cancel posts, even for major ToS violations, unless the circumstances are very extreme. (1) YOU need to request that the posts be cancelled, else LUGNET is exercising editorial control which they only very rarely (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
