Subject:
|
Re: News archive/Msg. Expiration
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Oct 1998 16:43:34 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jthompson@^NoSpam^teubner.com
|
Viewed:
|
564 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) writes:
>
> > Thomas Main <main@appstate.edu> wrote:
> > > When these groups are announced to the r.t.l. as a whole, will these
> > > "beta" posts be visible? Also, is an archive planned? I think what I
> > > will miss most about reading Lego newsgroups via LUGNET is no archiving
> > > and searching of messages like Dejanews provided for r.t.l.
> >
> > I imagine (and I mean that -- I'm making this up right now, based completely
> > on my own little universe and not on anything I've read or seen) that Todd
> > will eventually make some sort of web-based access to the newsgroup,
> > including a search funciton.
>
> Yea, that's the idea. The search function may not appear before articles
> have to be archived/expired, but they won't be tossed out. In the worst
> case, the old articles would still be available somewhere in some raw,
> non-searchable way -- maybe via HTTP or maybe here via NNTP in some kind of
> archives ng...
Plan on abiding by the x-no-archive convention?
Just curious - I can't imagine why someone wouldn't want their
posts to show up in a lugnet archive, and, in fact, I regret having
used the x-no-archive header for a long time in the past. Prevents
me from going back to dejanews and dusting off, say, my noncanonical
and incomplete list of named minifigures I used to post.
--
jthompson@teubner.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: News archive/Msg. Expiration
|
| (...) Maybe. It will definitely ignore it in terms of the actual archiving, but it might honor it in terms of re-serving it publicly later. Will need to cogitate on this one. --Todd (26 years ago, 2-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: News archive/Msg. Expiration
|
| (...) Yea, that's the idea. The search function may not appear before articles have to be archived/expired, but they won't be tossed out. In the worst case, the old articles would still be available somewhere in some raw, non-searchable way -- maybe (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
