 | | Re: robotics sub-groups —Linc Smith
|
| | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <36a8875a.87082873@l...et.com>... (...) firmware or (...) I agree with Kekoa, having an alternate firmware group is good enough for now. At a later date it could be split if needed. As of now I think that LegOS and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: robotics sub-groups —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) No, lugnet.comp.lang would be any discussion about computer languages ('lugnet' implies that it should be LEGO-relevant, but it's not explicit). lugnet.robotics.lang would be better, I think. But Todd listed other possibilities which are (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: robotics sub-groups —Linc Smith
|
| | | | Steve Bliss wrote (...) ***Whoops***, I meant "robotics" instead of "comp" in that suggestion. I agree that comp is NOT a good idea. A little usenet slip ;) LINC (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
