|
|
 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) <tummy tuck> (...) Chris, The paranoid part of me makes me think that Larrys text above is, at least in part, aimed at me. The irony is, off course, that Larrys well chosen words are nothing but contradictory subjective prattle themselves. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) I see the potential value in .debate, but the way it has started to go recently, I find I am getting frustrated and angry more and more frequently, to the point that I'm not getting anything out of it. One problem is that potentially each time (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Not sure of the answers to either of those, at least not in an idealised society. (...) I think my threshold is somewhere around large tanks and fighter jets. Any sort of nukes just sort of "feel wrong" to me. It's a fuzzy argument. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Debate's current problem (was Re: Uselessness of .debate)
|
| Frank Filz wrote in message <3A3F972C.2F1C@minds...ng.com>... (...) Having followed a great many debates here, on Usenet and in my workplace SPAM forum[1], I have watched some of the greats[2] at work such as the legendary Derek Smart, and our own (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Excessive Cross Posting
|
| Yes, if you post to .lsahs, it requires a followup when sent via NNTP. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer (25 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |