 | | Re: Error in Hash Database again? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | Todd, Is this why there are posts from Dec 8th mixed in with today's posts? Jude (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Error in Hash Database again? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I was just popping over here to report that! (URL) example, is currently showing this post as 21 minutes old (URL) the very next post in its list is shown as 24 minutes old (URL) is from yesterday... (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Error in Hash Database again? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I think this can happen when a post sits in the sender's outbox (perhaps because they are offline) for a while before it is posted - I am pretty sure it is listed by sent date, but the age is based on when it reaches LUGNET. Does that make (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Error in Hash Database again? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Indeed it does, and perhaps that is what it was. But I could swear I saw the very post that was mixed in there long long ago (on the 10th) and then it reappeared out of order. But it could have been a dup that got stuck somewhere and just now (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Error in Hash Database again? —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) well, since the error was a non-fatal one (if I recall correctly) the message will not bounce right away, but will try to resend for a while... If sendmail was refusing connections for, say, 4 hours, some messages might be delayed up to 8 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
