|
|
 | | Re: Membership Packets
|
| (...) Todd, Thank you for personally responding. I am glad to hear that the membership packets are indeed still being distributed. I can only imagine the amount of time this must consume. Thank you for your continued efforts. Sincerely, Ken Wright (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
| (...) Maybe it would be too much overshoot for the job, but last week some computer company send me an advert. It featured a special laser printer, with he size of an HP 2100, having three separate magazines for advert brochures/cards, letter (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| (...) No! I disagree! Etc etc. :) Darned UUs! Any forum is only as good as its practitioners. Since LUGNET went 'live' I've operated with the assumption that .debate matters stay in .debate, and expect others to do the same--I've only once seen what (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Leakage from .debate
|
| (...) No, it's a good point. I was wondering about that myself. I, of course, would like to think I'm nifty! enough that I don't let how things go in one group influence how they go in another, and especially not to the point of lambasting a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Leakage from .debate
|
| I don't want to drag another thread into the discussion about .debate, but in the following post: (URL) says: (...) Larry - I'm curious, do you feel that your response to Christopher may have been more harsh than it may have deserved to be, perhaps (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
