 | | Re: Membership Packets
|
|
(...) Todd, Thank you for personally responding. I am glad to hear that the membership packets are indeed still being distributed. I can only imagine the amount of time this must consume. Thank you for your continued efforts. Sincerely, Ken Wright (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
(...) Maybe it would be too much overshoot for the job, but last week some computer company send me an advert. It featured a special laser printer, with he size of an HP 2100, having three separate magazines for advert brochures/cards, letter (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) No! I disagree! Etc etc. :) Darned UUs! Any forum is only as good as its practitioners. Since LUGNET went 'live' I've operated with the assumption that .debate matters stay in .debate, and expect others to do the same--I've only once seen what (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Leakage from .debate
|
|
(...) No, it's a good point. I was wondering about that myself. I, of course, would like to think I'm nifty! enough that I don't let how things go in one group influence how they go in another, and especially not to the point of lambasting a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Leakage from .debate
|
|
I don't want to drag another thread into the discussion about .debate, but in the following post: (URL) says: (...) Larry - I'm curious, do you feel that your response to Christopher may have been more harsh than it may have deserved to be, perhaps (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) I would like to see .debate be able to exist as something worthwhile, but I sense that with each debate which explodes into a ravaging god vs science debate, we lose another of the folks who are interested in serious debate. I'm not sure how (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Oops. My bad. I should have caught that, but as you say, I was away for what has got to be one of the biggest weeks on l.o-t.d and was racing to mow through hundreds of posts. At this point I'm overwhelmed and haven't even looked at the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Some thoughts: - I've wondered if .debate should have a no-crossposting rule, except for crossposting in (which can easily be checked, for a post to be accepted which is cross-posted in .debate and any other group, it must be a followup to a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) It leaked over here when a .debate novice set FUT incorrectly to point here just because something funny was said. I set the FUT back in my reply, but of course, once ONE post appears in a group, you always run the risk of latecomers missing (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
(...) It's not possible, no. Security and privacy issues as well as technical logistics. What I need to do to break the bottleneck is change the way I print cards. Most of the steps of the other stuff are automated but there is a manual step with (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
