 | | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) For the non-numeric among us: 0 - Black 1 - Blue 2 - Green 3 - Teal 4 - Red 5 - Dark Pink 6 - Brown 7 - Light Gray 8 - Dark Gray 9 - Light Blue 10 - Bright/Light Green 11 - Turquoise 12 - Scala Salmon (I'm winging it. This color is not a very (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) These are great. Todd, might you have a few minutes to write a Random Part/Colour Generator like the Random Set Name Generator? Idea stimulants for CAD builders! By the way, these are nice for fountains: (URL) Heather -- Heather Patey Pirate (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) People seem to be suggesting, though, that one should not choose to voice that opinion. If person A can voice an opinion that persons B, C, and D find offensive (and to be honest - persons E, F, and G couldn't care less about) I'd say B, C, or (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) strongly (...) to (...) Well it wasn't *intended* as a witch hunt. More of a rhetorical question, because i'm not sure there *are* any people who still feel that someone should be tossed soley for opinions. <snip Mike's eloquent distinction (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) And/or perhaps in some cases overstated. Or overly stressed. (...) I sent Todd a few private e-mails on this subject (most of which dealt pretty specifically with apologizing for blowing my top and asking him to remove my emotionally charged (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) So would I. No one ever said you couldn't choose who to like and who not to like. (...) Actually, if I felt that way, yeah, I would be ashamed of myself. (...) Just because he may have been here on Lugnet doesn't mean you *must* associate with (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Actually I'm not including myself to that a few remaining, but in case of any doubt, here is my reasoning, in which I tried to word it as much clear as possible: (URL) there is any flaws, replies would be really appreciated. Selçuk (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I just wanted to add that I agree with Eric J. once again. I know I and a few others were playing a bit of devils advocate durring this discussion. Thats mostly because I thought several peoples reasoning for banishment were misguided. There (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> That rocks, man! Way cool. Thanks, Steve and Todd. (...) waterfall in a diorama. (GMLTC didn't have a waterfall in the last layout for lack of trans blue bricks, and for lack of place to put it) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I agree. However... I think that there were people who felt that way initially, but that many, if not all, have come around to reject that view. And that's a good thing. For the few remaining, can you identify yourselves and post reasons why (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
How 'bout Chrome BURPS!!? (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) Full-on swingage! OK, I see the other colors there too now. Man, this fully rocks! These are nice and very small and _very_ quick to load. (...) Yup, that's great. (...) Fine too! (...) OK, I got 'em up now, and the URLs go like this: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I think Eric meant it as wise advice. --Todd (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Me too. (...) Not sure why he needs to be very careful, since the decision years from now whether or not to banish someone else will still be Todd's decision to make, not mine or yours or anyone else's (unless Todd decides to make it someone (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) It's very difficult -- and I'm not even going to try -- to sum everything up in a nice simple pat statement (not that you're asking for one), since, to various extents, I agree with almost everything that everyone here has said. My opinions (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) <snip? (...) OK quick question(1). Now I don't think many/any of us know much of Matthew other than he has some personal issues to work out and that he likes to cause havoc. So here's the question. Assume that Matthew is say 14 and he is (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) D'oh. I don't know where I got the impression that he was fairly new (to posting, at least, because there's no way to tell how long someone's been lurking). That does color things slightly- after all, it means he's been here long enough to (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
(...) That would be censorship. No. (...) Even if it _didn't_ have LEGO material, they wouldn't get banned simply for posting a site address, no. Hopefully of course they wouldn't be posting such an address with malicious intentions to injure others (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Agreed. I went and looked using the search function. I may have missed some but I found a number of posts from Matthew going quite a ways back. Some were hyperbolic, but none (that I found, but I may have missed some) were vitriolic. Nothing (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
