Subject:
|
Re: My Stance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:51:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4157 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Joslin writes:
> >
> > > The only thing that got me really riled in the whole situation is people's
> > > obsession with making his *viewpoints* a reason to ToSs him, which I • strongly
> > > disagree about.
> >
> > I agree. However...
> >
> > I think that there were people who felt that way initially, but that many, if
> > not all, have come around to reject that view. And that's a good thing. For
> > the few remaining, can you identify yourselves and post reasons why we need • to
> > judge opinions and not behaviour?
>
> Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse-
> witch-hunt.
Well it wasn't *intended* as a witch hunt. More of a rhetorical question,
because i'm not sure there *are* any people who still feel that someone should
be tossed soley for opinions.
<snip Mike's eloquent distinction between disliking someone for their opinions
and between using those opinions as the basis for a ToSs>
The snipped part demonstrates that you're not one...
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
