 | | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Friends, I know I'm not very fluent in this language which is native to me, so I rewording it again: He started a flame war. He did that knowingly, and he even chose the person to flame by rather randomly, since he did that just for the sake (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) I let this one sit for a while, maybe should let it sit even longer. I think we do need to separate the issue of what to do about MM (which seems to be coming to a consensus, more or less) from the larger issue of whether Lugnet is (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Friendliest Place On The Internet. (Was Re: What's going to happen.)
|
|
Thanks for the reply Paul. I was being afraid of there would not be one. And of course be sure that there was no hard feelings, and we of course friends just as before. But I still want to make clear something. For me "friendliest" doesn't mean (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
Selçuk Göre skrev i meddelandet <39F0D9E8.9A73C9F@su...ne.com>... (...) what (...) I don't think 'suspicions' are enough to judge anyone. 'Evidence' is what's used for that. The evidence in this case are the messages posted on lugnet, nothing else. (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
(...) It's possible that you are the only one with that viewpoint. (...) I think that's debatable too, but it's off-site and therefore moot as far as LUGNET is concerned. (...) I'm willing to bet 99% of people would disagree with that. (URL) (line (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
I got to thinking today about what I REALLY did wrong here. What did I do wrong? I attacked Jude's site in a somewhat mean way and didn't give any reasons as to why I thought so. And that's it. That's all I did wrong. Well I did also get caught up (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The Friendliest Place On The Internet. (Was Re: What's going to happen.)
|
|
Selçuk Göre wrote in message ... (...) the (...) Selçuk, Mike, and everyone, I'm sorry for any name-calling. I was angry and upset and I didn't realise how much it came out like a flame. I'm sure than we can forget this, and continue to "play well" (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET and Matthew Moulton
|
|
G'day folks, Yesterday, I think it was, I posted a message about how happy I was that I managed to stay out of the flame war. Now that discussions are a lot less heated, I think I'll add some thoughts. I've been thinking in point-form lately, so (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: No tolerance proposal.
|
|
(...) Hmm.... thinking about exactly what's been going on around here, I think add my $.02 to the issue. - As to whether or not Matthew deserves to be permanently banned, as I've said before, no. As for temporary banishment, perhaps. I could (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
Apology accepted, Mike. That's all I ever see is necessary. Cheers, Paul Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) (namecalling (...) on (...) he (...) caused (...) learned (...) it (...) the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) I think you got it the second time ;-) you need to do a little practice in "swenglish", or me in english. LOL It was a good answer, and I think you deliberately made it loooong to keep me busy for a while;-) (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | No tolerance proposal.
|
|
I know that some people do not think I am sincere in my apologies and they want to see me banned. I would however like to make a no tolerance proposal. Basically I think that I should be on a sort of probation period for say the next three months. (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) My professional opinion is I'm concerned that the arguments of the past 36 hours have been more about Matthew and his continued presence or non-presence and less about the underlying issues he was trying to raise. Perhaps the collective mind (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) No, I'm pretty sure we are, since there are people that are still telling Todd they want to see him banned permanently. I don't think that's right, and apparently (based on other people's posts here) I'm not alone in thinking that. Based on (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) I don't understand the question. --Todd (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
Well said, Larry. Build On! John Matthews Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2rA03.5Gt@lugnet.com... (...) site, (...) about (...) what (...) although (...) about (...) announcement (...) mostly (...) fundamental (...) (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
*Well, maybe I do not have the knowledge to speak/write in the language oher than my own, but hey, I'm here to learn* Todd! I think that the service you provide us/me is more than I/we could ever have been asking for. I think that the service you (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) LEGO (...) do (...) he (...) Well, yes and no. :-) Todd's manifesto was so well written, so thoughtful, so detailed, and so ahead of its time that when *I* read it, I begged Todd to come to Cambridge Technology Partners (1) as a consultant for (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I think we are not talking about "excluding him from Lugnet", he is already excluded in some way, and not for his web content. What we are talking about is whether his apologies are sincere or not. And his web content makes me believing the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I don't. (...) He's simply stating some things he doesn't like about the Lego community as he sees it. What's the problem with that? Once again, what it comes down to is this: Over on *his* site, which you are under no obligation to (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
