Subject:
|
Re: My Stance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:52:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3342 times
|
| |
|
|
Selçuk Göre skrev i meddelandet <39F0D9E8.9A73C9F@superonline.com>...
>
> Eric Kingsley wrote:
>
> <snip>
> >
> > > I'm merely saying that the attitudes on Lugnet that he currently holds
> > > should be consistent with his site, and we can use that as a meter to see
> > > his true condition.
> >
> > Well we can just disagree on that I guess. I think as long as he carries
> > himself properly on LUGNET and follows LUGNET's TOS then I could care less • what
> > he has on his site.
> >
> > Eric Kingsley
>
> I will be agreeing you on this for a different case but not this. We are
> not trying to rationalize to TOS him because of his web content. It's
> just his web content is another evidence for making his (in my mind)
> suspicious apologies more suspicious than ever.
I don't think 'suspicions' are enough to judge anyone. 'Evidence' is what's
used for that. The evidence in this case are the messages posted on lugnet,
nothing else. A web site, paper on the wall, speech on the radio, etc. etc.
has nothing to do with the lugnet ToS, and cannot IMO be used as an argument
for excluding anyone.
As for the sincerity of his apologies, who are we to judge on suspicions? Only
his actions on lugnet can tell...
If you asked me how to proceed, I would say: Let him in again, and throw him
out for good if the ToS are violated again.
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Friends, I know I'm not very fluent in this language which is native to me, so I rewording it again: He started a flame war. He did that knowingly, and he even chose the person to flame by rather randomly, since he did that just for the sake (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Stance
|
| Eric Kingsley wrote: <snip> (...) I will be agreeing you on this for a different case but not this. We are not trying to rationalize to TOS him because of his web content. It's just his web content is another evidence for making his (in my mind) (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
