Subject:
|
Re: My Stance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:48:56 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
SSGORE@SUPERONLINEspamless.COM
|
Viewed:
|
3256 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric Kingsley wrote:
<snip>
>
> > I'm merely saying that the attitudes on Lugnet that he currently holds
> > should be consistent with his site, and we can use that as a meter to see
> > his true condition.
>
> Well we can just disagree on that I guess. I think as long as he carries
> himself properly on LUGNET and follows LUGNET's TOS then I could care less what
> he has on his site.
>
> Eric Kingsley
I will be agreeing you on this for a different case but not this. We are
not trying to rationalize to TOS him because of his web content. It's
just his web content is another evidence for making his (in my mind)
suspicious apologies more suspicious than ever.
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| Selçuk Göre skrev i meddelandet <39F0D9E8.9A73C9F@su...ne.com>... (...) what (...) I don't think 'suspicions' are enough to judge anyone. 'Evidence' is what's used for that. The evidence in this case are the messages posted on lugnet, nothing else. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) <snip? (...) First I should appoligize because "Clouds" was not the right word. What I was trying to say is that I think you feel a closer connection with James and his legacy than many of us do. That makes what Matthew did more personal to (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
