 | | A reixamination of what happened. —Matthew Moulton
|
| | | I got to thinking today about what I REALLY did wrong here. What did I do wrong? I attacked Jude's site in a somewhat mean way and didn't give any reasons as to why I thought so. And that's it. That's all I did wrong. Well I did also get caught up (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) It's possible that you are the only one with that viewpoint. (...) I think that's debatable too, but it's off-site and therefore moot as far as LUGNET is concerned. (...) I'm willing to bet 99% of people would disagree with that. (URL) (line (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Matthew Moulton
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, but so far I haven't seen anyone show any evidence which points to the contrary. I mean let's see some evidence that I did something else wrong. And I don't mean weird conspiracies based on things I did over a year ago. And I also don't (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) You never were, and still aren't, in my mind. What you put on your site led me and countless others to the personal conclusion that you are a jerk, but that's a completely separate issue from judgment of what you did or didn't do here on this (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G2t3zJ.F5K@lugnet.com... (...) Yup. And how you're handling things now to me is just proving to me that perhaps I should not have been so quick to give you another chance a couple days ago. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Ka-On Lee
|
| | | | | | (...) Sign... I wish I can also do or say anything and expect others to take it easily if I got "very angry". You must be very special to have such privilege. (...) And people can't take your remarks on your public site personally because? (...) And (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) That would be censorship. No. (...) Even if it _didn't_ have LEGO material, they wouldn't get banned simply for posting a site address, no. Hopefully of course they wouldn't be posting such an address with malicious intentions to injure others (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A reixamination of what happened. —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) While I would certainly agree that one person with a petty vendetta does not make a "huge conspiracy", if the idea that you were purposely out to harm the online LEGO community is "bs", how do you explain this post: (URL) seems pretty clear to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
