 | | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
|
I started to receive emails too. The first one was posted at 6:42 PM. It looks like it was just posted to LUGNET a very short time ago. I have nothing before that, back to around 12 noon. -Andy Lynch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd Lehman" (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
|
(...) Here are the date headers from on emssage I've gotten: (coincidently it's from you :^) Check your email for the full message headers if you think they'll help. Posted-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:49:29 GMT Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:49:29 GMT (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
|
(...) That's strange. The problem isn't 100% fixed yet on the server. What date stamp appears on the message (particularly, the time of day)? (...) I may have to ask the server to resend things. --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
|
(...) I'm starting to receive LUGNET emails again. Thanks. Any idea if the backlog will eventually get deivered? or is it gone? -Kyle (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spam alert!
|
|
(...) Ben, Dunno if anyone in the mammoth thread suggested this, but you could always use the web interface at work. I'm forced to use this at a couple of sites, cos they block NNTP, and it's really not that bad. If you set up your posting settings, (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
|
(...) Wait...no...I take it back -- there is something wrong. I forgot to look in one of the most obvious places. I don't think any mail is going out. Hang on. --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
|
[redirecting to .admin.general] (...) That's not too unusual -- email is one of the more unreliable forms of communication on the Internet (if you're looking for quick speed and that), although things almost always get delivered eventually. I just (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spam alert!
|
|
(...) my (...) while (...) Unfortunately, such people are unlikely to take any notice of such conditions. And any legal action against them is probably doomed to failure, and will certainly be expensive. The best two solutions are probably: 1. Never (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Membership link ideas
|
|
(...) I don't have the data indexed by location, so it would have to scan linearly over all the data. Perhaps in the future. For now, you can get the answer by looking at the "by country" list (everyone on one big page -- give it a while to load)... (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks...
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) nobody (...) than (...) Oops..... I'm sorry, I didn't realise people had a major problem with this. I guess that because I'm using a news-reader app instead of the browser, every use of FUT is a broken (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "ignore user"
|
|
Personally, I would love to see an "ignore user" function. (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spam alert!
|
|
I have been reading many messages lately about email address being pulled out of newsgroups. I have to kick in my two cents here, because this is driving me nuts. Newsgroup email harvesting has been happening since the creation of newsgroups. You (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) D'oh! I forgot my own footnote. [1] I was there to flame. I enjoy flaming people. I don't think it's a big crime, especially if you keep it to places where it's appropriate, such as alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, ne.internet.services (circa (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref Update
|
|
(...) I have all the time in the world, I've just proven myself to be either too dumb to follow Steve's instructions or incapable of accurately explaining my problems with the process. :( If anyone can figure it out it's Steve. When I finally got to (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) AUK is defintely alt.usenet.kooks. I have spent some time there myself, it is definitely a flame group. The entire purpose of the group is to ridicule, well, "usenet kooks". People that post there generally get there in one of two ways- either (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Membership link ideas
|
|
(...) Heh. My first thought was that it would 'benefit' more males than females. That's defining 'benefit' as 'use the feature'. Steve (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref Update
|
|
(...) I worked on this a bit last night. The process needs just a bit of additional functionality, and I'll be able to whip through all the desired colors. Steve (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Todd, You are totally right in doing it. You were more than fair giving him a chance to cool off. I do regret you were brought to the point of cutting him off, but it had to be (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) Fells like that? whoa... Thank you Todd, I feel like you shouldn't wait this much..:-) I personally believe that if I can't find anything to say for an individual's behavior other than "what kind of an *** **** are you?" (I know much better (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
