 | | RE: Adding sets to personal set lists (was: no subject)
|
|
Geez, why can't I include a subject... (...) (26 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (no subject)
|
|
Hey Todd, Is there some way we can add the list of sets we own ((URL) adding them one at a time? For example, is there a way that I can send LUGNET a list of set numbers and have it add them all to my set list? If not, are you planning on adding (...) (26 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Shopping Report Search by % off
|
|
Would it be possible to generate a list of sets by % off? For example clicking on the Price Blowout icon at the bottom of the report legend will take you to a list of all sets 50% off or better. What do you think? Chris mechanizedbrick@aol.com (26 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Minor tweak
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reminder - It is indeed part of "Posting Setup". SRC (26 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting notices about ldraw.org (and other website) inaccessability
|
|
(...) It wouldn't work. People reporting anything inaccessable about ldraw.org would crosspost to .cad.dev.org.ldraw. And issues about the ldraw.org website are what the group is for anyway. --Todd (26 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting notices about ldraw.org (and other website) inaccessability
|
|
"Adam Ogle" <oglewood@lcs.net> wrote in message news:G156s0.55D@lugnet.com... (...) Sounds like a good idea! Todd? Anyone? -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 AIM: TimCourtne (26 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting notices about ldraw.org (and other website) inaccessability
|
|
Hey Tim, I have a better idea. Why not start a group, e.g. lugnet.webpage It could have subgroups of .updates .inaccessable I would be worth a try and I am tired of cheking this group and all it having is post about inaccessablilty. Oh Well Adam O (...) (26 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
Selam, Haklisin, "cash in envelop" her zaman kullandigim metod, ve simdiye kadar hep calisti (70 den fazla)..:-) Ancak parayi bir-iki normal sayfa arasina saklamayi ihmal etme. Selçuk PS. Sorry for the language people..:-) But Hakan is the first (...) (26 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
(...) Hakan, After you fill out the enrollment form, (URL) server will later send a confirmation e-mail which will include the mailing address. --Todd (26 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
(...) Sending USD in a letter (and accepting the risk of having the sum stolen) seems to be the most acceptable version to me. What would the postal adress be? A (rather quick) check at lugnet.com didn't turn up an adress. Regards, Hakan (26 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
You can send the money directly i you are willing to take the risk... It worked well from Sweden. (If you get the adress right...) Other option are way to expensive. /Jocke "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new set database
|
|
(...) Well, PayPal says they'll be doing international payments soon (they've been saying that for a while, but I *think* I just heard it was supposed to be happening in the next month). But certainly if you felt safe sending cash (and it's not (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) These things always seem to blow up when someone exercises "vigilante justice" (I haven't followed through 100% of this particular instance to say that this one is a case of "vigilante justice" but I'm speaking from a general viewpoint). What (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Regional food (was Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) Really? How odd. In my experience you can't be in Scotland for more than 12 hours without *seeing* a haggis, and more than 48 before someone corners you into eating it. Secretly, I beleive that none of you eat it at all when tourists aren't (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) are, (...) My reply to Todd was an attempt to change the situation. Just because it was not the sort of change you seek it does not mean I am wrong (or correct). (...) my (...) jokes. I could claim that you assuming (correctly) that I was a (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) I did not mean ridicule anyone or anything. I feel like ridiculing someone right now, but I am too busy... Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) This is a key point - I think Todd covered it. Rules do exist, and they should be respected. However, enforcing them in a "jobs worth" manner just alienates everyone. If we all sifted through each and every post and winged about infractions at (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
Lorbaat wrote: ..... (...) Is there any possibility that the complaint, or the system itself are somehow ridiculous at least a bit (especially when stretched)? Selçuk (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Load too high?
|
|
(...) No. Depending on what the processes are doing, you can have dozens of httpd processes all impacting the load average very negigibly, especially if they're blocked on I/O writes to the socket. --Todd (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Load too high?
|
|
(...) Umm, isn't that what MaxClients is for? The only thing I use load triggerd shutoff for is the Virtual Explorer, since someone could (and has) pointed a rude paralell robots.txt ignoring web-sucker at it and caused 40+ povray renderings to (...) (26 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
