 | | Re: defining proper content
|
| "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:010e01c006fd$12...8d0@SES... (...) civil (...) isn't (...) a (...) Yeah. I did that about a year and a half ago and it made a difference. Though o-t.debate is somehwat necessary, I (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: defining proper content
|
| (...) Heh. Meeee toooo. (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: defining proper content
|
| (...) in (...) for (...) I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am a lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : ) I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good chunk of life, but I try to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: defining proper content
|
| (...) am (...) It is very distructive, and I found that I was thinking about it all the time, and I decided to drop it. It is a healthy move, IMO. I rather discuss LEGO items more than anything. (...) but (...) won't (...) age (...) its (...) Yes, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
