 | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Yes, a group can be made to be read-only for everyone except the server administrator and a moderator (or a set of moderators). I've never created a moderated group before, but as far as I can tell, they're fairly easy to set up inside the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Gary Louie
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, this was my intent. I was not suggesting a moderated news group. A moderated news group sounds like it is too much work. (...) Yes, I think it should work this way. Except, I suppose the original message would need to be posted to the new (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote: <moderated technical difficulties> This is your server and you have the source. Why do it the conventional way? Instead of mailing the proposed article, save it on the server. Moderator then periodically uses the web interface to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Mmm, yes -- down the road, this would surely be a cool way to go. Need the other infrastructure stuff there first, though, before something like this, otherwise this detracts from the other path with relatively little gain given current (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) I've re-read this a few times trying to come up with a lengthy response, but I'm really just too busy and tired right now to try to help make a decision like this. Basically, I'll do what you (collectively if it is to be a group-hashed out (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
