| | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| (...) I'd think you'd _prefer_ this -- if the thread has moved away from something you're interested in, why would you want to read it anymore? Or, if it is something you want to follow, why not follow that group? (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| Matthew Miller skrev i meddelandet ... (...) You're missing the point: the *thread* is still interesting, *the other group* is not (generally) interesting, time is limited, modem is slow, budget is limited. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| (...) There's a difference between being interested in a particular *thread*, and being interested in a particular newsgroup. I don't subscribe to lugnet.castle.*, because I don't have the time. That doesn't mean I'm totally disinterested in all (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| (...) Yes, definitely. So what's the problem? :) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| (...) Perhaps I am. What makes a thread about digital cameras that started in .publish less interesting than a thread with identical content that began in .castle? (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| (...) They're never going to be identical. Take off your "fast internet access, too cheap to meter" blinders for a while and try to think through the perspective of someone from Europe or elsewhere who has to pay by the second or by the byte and who (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| (...) I'm thinking of it that way. If a thread wandered way off topic in a group I was downloading, I'd want it to move to the proper place so I don't have to waste time wading through it. Conversely, I'd want everything interesting on a certain (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: FUT, FUT, FUT....
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message ... (...) Exactly, well put. If the writer clearly states intent to _conclude_ the on-topic discussion and start an off-topic one, then I don't have a problem either. It's when there could still be somewhat relevant (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |