 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) Does that mean the current 2-choice incarnation is the final one? If the score display in the group-view is only limited to three choices (bad/neutral,good,excellent), then there isn't the same danger of feelings getting hurt - so why not (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) "Bad"? Where's this coming from? One suggestion might be to change the input field from a dropdown to being a checkbox. (Although this makes having two choices more complicated.) The current dropdown is actually indended (if I'm understanding (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | | (...) ^^^^^^^^ intended (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | (...) It's the category in which all the bad and neutral posts will live (unrated). (...) If there are going to only be three choices, then I'd prefer buttons - one click instead of click,locate,scroll,...ate,click. Richard (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | | (...) Do you think that this: (...) would reduce the perception that unrated = bad? (Assuming that the button is labelled something like "spotlight"?) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Neutral is only bad when 4 out of 5 messages are higher than non-neutral and the odd neutral stands out for not having been uprated. This new arrangement (hopefully) will have the opposite -- 4 out of 5 messages neutral and only 1 out 5 (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Not neccessarily, no. It's conceivable (hopefully unlikely) that the whole thing is still no good. Need to gather a couple days of feedback, I think, and switch tasks. (...) Three choices -- neutral, excellent, way excellent -- no bad. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) That's another way you could arrange the form: Comments? * No comment * great post * excellent post [Submit] where * is a radio button. Just my .02 --Bram (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I was just saying "neutral, excellent, way excellent" in reply to something as a means of clarification. We'd actually like to avoid any kind of qualitative judgment type words in the choices. By saying "Highlight" and "Spotlight" (assuming (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
