To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6281
6280  |  6282
Subject: 
Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 03:38:41 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdmSAYNOTOSPAM.org
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
844 times
  
Chris Busse <cbusse@infi.net> wrote:
That sounds like an excellent idea, but how would the votes be tallied? ie:
21-Apr-00 03:25  [5/1] Re: Check out this set! — John Doe

where 5 = the number of yes this is exceptional votes, and 1 = the number of
this is OT votes?  (my apologies if you already covered this in the other

Yeah, I think the two numbers should be kept separately. It's quite possible
(although unfortunate) to have a great off-topic post. "Off-topic" wouldn't
necessarily penalize anyone -- it'd just be a more clean way of saying "hey,
that didn't belong here" than posting another (also off topic) message.

Then, the "Great post" scores could be used to compile a "spotlight" page. I
don't think that giving a scale of numbers adds very much (anyway, that's
what having multiple people is for) and it certainly seems to be causing
confusion and negativity.


--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                     --->               http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux             --->                http://linux.bu.edu/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
 
The simplified system also has the advantage of being much easier to squish into existing newsreaders. Since it wouldn't require reading scores from the server (altough that could be hacked in optionally) and since there are far less options, it's (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
 
(...) That sounds like an excellent idea, but how would the votes be tallied? ie: 21-Apr-00 03:25 [5/1] Re: Check out this set! — John Doe where 5 = the number of yes this is exceptional votes, and 1 = the number of this is OT votes? (my apologies (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR