Subject:
|
Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 03:29:29 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
780 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> You may have missed my "two button" proposal in all of the current noise :)
> so I'll repeat it. I'd like to see Todd's fancy cool geek stuff stripped
> down to two buttons: "This post is exceptional" and "This post is
> off-topic". In fact, if people prefer, I'd even do without the second one.
That sounds like an excellent idea, but how would the votes be tallied? ie:
21-Apr-00 03:25 [5/1] Re: Check out this set! — John Doe
where 5 = the number of yes this is exceptional votes, and 1 = the number of
this is OT votes? (my apologies if you already covered this in the other
thread).
I definitely like the idea of this method better, as it obviously prevents
anything from being averaged down.
Chris Busse
http://www.bussetech.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
|
| (...) Yeah, I think the two numbers should be kept separately. It's quite possible (although unfortunate) to have a great off-topic post. "Off-topic" wouldn't necessarily penalize anyone -- it'd just be a more clean way of saying "hey, that didn't (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
|
| (...) I think you've got the details right, but I'd disgree with your assessment of the result. I'd say that slashdot's moderation system has been quite successful. In the early days, /. was fun to read and had good discussions. But when it passed a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
