 | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
|
(...) Whoa, you lost me here. Not all newsreaders are created equal. For example, I just checked MSOE v4.72 and could not locate any settings to exclude cross-posted messages--have looked for this a few times before, too. My alternate newsreader, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
|
(...) It doesn't send you multiple copies of crossposted articles via e-mail. It's smart enough to know that if you're subscribed to both A and B, and someone crossposts to both A and B, to send you only one copy rather than two. (Of course in (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
|
(...) cross-posted (...) Okay, something about Digest mode is what I was thinking, but I could not get my brain to connect to my fingertips on this one. I do not receive any groups using delayed digest mode any more, so just was not totally sure. It (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
|
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 06:08:37 GMT "Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote concerning 'Re: LUGNET getting too complex?': (...) you are correct, I'm not sure all newsreaders do it, but from my (limited) experience, it's a common feature. I haven't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
|
"Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FtAx2D.GB2@lugnet.com... (...) example, I (...) As an aside I should point out that Outlook Express 5 is does spot cross-posted messages and marks them as downloaded and read if one has (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
