 | | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) are (...) Thanks for your reply. Todd gave a completely accurate response to your comments which nevertheless didn't actually shed any light on what might have been done to make my post more useful. ++Lar (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) If you're talking about... (URL) can only speak for myself (not the other 40-value that's there, and I hope whoever it is feels no pressure to speak up) but IIRC, I gave it a 40 because I was quite confident that the trains would turn out to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) Here's my thinking, no one should feel pressure. But... feedback works better if one knows why. Normally I don't ask. But when I do, it's because I'm genuinely curious and want to improve. (no one OWES a post good feedback because of who the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) Article ratings aren't supposed to be feedback. The ratings are supposed to describe to readers approximately how helpful or useful or interesting or fun an article might be to them -- giving them some sense of what to expect. (...) What's (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) Is there a chance of hiding the ratings/scores once the tables are up? By showing the scores next to the articles, web-interface users can't help noticing responses, and then wondering why they are the way they are. I'll repeat the old (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) If that's true, then maybe the default vote from the system should be 0 rather than 50. --Todd (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
