Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Mar 2000 17:00:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com
|
Viewed:
|
1552 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000 04:43:38 GMT, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com>
wrote:
> Today:
>
> MSIE2 - 118 - 4.1%
> MSIE3 - 62 - 2.2%
> MSIE4 - 831 - 29.1%
> MSIE5 - 1848 - 64.6%
>
> Almost 200 people running old MSIE.
That's just staggeringly unbelievable. Not that you aren't reporting
the stats you have, of course, I trust you and your server. But to
think that people would still be using it. I have to assume they're
using a computer over which they have no control.
IE2, the browser that comes with NT4, won't even work on Microsoft's
own site.
--
Tired of waiting for LEGO Direct? Bulk Parts Sales NOW!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/lego/sales/parts.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) I hafta agree, it's pretty crazy. What shipped with the original Win95? Was it MSIE2 or MSIE1? Probably quite a few old machines out there with old Win95 installations on 486's & Pentium 60's with 4MB/8MB RAM...? (...) Hee hee. That makes (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) Once a bug, always a bug. That's the way it is serving HTML, until an old release trickles off to zero. MSIE3 is still buggy and still in use. I titled the subject "Why MSIE sucks for the HTML *writer*" not "Why MSIE sucks for the user". (...) (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
