Subject:
|
Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:46:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
316 times
|
| |
|
|
"Lorbaat" <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> wrote in message
news:Fr2BCv.I46@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Joslin writes:
> > > In lugnet.admin.council, Scott Arthur writes:
> > >
> > > > Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
> > > >
> > > > By "theme", I mean castle, space pirate etc.
> > > >
> > > > I suggest the pre-auction announcements should be allowed in all theme
> > > > groups,
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Let me be among those to vote that this is a Bad Idea (tm). Further • mitigating
> > > this is the fact that it's an Unnecessary Idea.
> >
> > No idea is "unnecessary".
>
> Well, there I'm forced to disagree. See below.
>
> > > Now, I'm all for market groups that are themed (ie lugnet.market.castle,
> > > lugnet.market.space, etc). I remember thinking this would be a good • idea at
> > > some point in the past, but it was recently suggested in another thread • in
> > > lugnet.admin.council.
> >
> > I agree 100%. I think I have suggested this at least once in the past, • both
> > times it was knocked on the head. This is well suited to groups like • technic.
> >
> > > I think this fills the need you're looking for (a place
> > > for people to find sales of specific themed sets) without blurring the • line
> > > between the discussion groups and the themed groups, which is something • Todd
> > > has indicated he is not going to allow to happen.
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> So, if you agree that making individual lugnet.market groups by theme fill • all
> the same needs as changing the charters of the discussion groups to allow
> marketing messages,
This would exceed the aims by a mile. As it would include _all_ market posts
> AND you understand that making individual lugnet.market
> groups for each theme has the added benefit of NOT asking Todd to do • something
> he has SPECIFICALLY said he doesn't want to do...
I do not follow this. You should understand that Todd is not a pile of logic
circuits - he is capable of changing his mind. But that was not the
intention of my post. The aim of my post was to get an idea of what people
feel on this issue. It has failed to do that. I am beginning to think most
people do not care either way. That is why post like this one can sit for
over 2 weeks without being mentioned:
http://www.lugnet.com/duplo/?n=116
>
> The idea is unnecessary. Or, at the very least, debating it is.
>
> eric
|
|
Message has 5 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
