 | | Re: Auction announcements do not belong in this group —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) DISCUSSION GROUP TERMS AND CONDITIONS LUGNET includes discussion groups which allow feedback and interaction between users. LUGNET and its owners and/or operators do not control or censor messages, information, or files delivered to discussion (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Auction announcements do not belong in this group —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) All right, Scott...point taken. You've made it clear to me that #11 needs a clarification. I'll fix the Terms document and post a brief message about the text change. It was never the intention -- even in the remotest sense -- for "groups (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Auction announcements do not belong in this group —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:Fr1pMH.FtG@lugnet.com... (...) this (...) its (...) Perhaps it does not need changed? (...) which (...) do (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Auction announcements do not belong in this group —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) It won't be a policy change, just a couple of additional sentences clarifying existing policy. Yes, the clarification does need to be added, else the confusion remains. --Todd (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Does a framwork exist for the subscibers to a group to change its charter? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Does a framework exist for the subscribers to a group to change its charter? If it does not, should it? Scott A "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:Fr1pMH.FtG@lugnet.com... (...) this (...) its (...) which (...) do (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does a framwork exist for the subscibers to a group to change its charter? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That's an excellent question. To some extent, yes, that framework does exist, and that is part of the role of the lugnet.admin.general newsgroup. Perhaps a more focused group (i.e., lugnet.admin.news) would better serve discussions about (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does a framwork exist for the subscibers to a group to change its charter? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Just as a note here, this phrasing strikes me as pejorative. (...) Calling it spam instead of "announcements and/or updates" is shorter, but it also prejudges. It's your site and your judgement but I did want to point it out. (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does a framwork exist for the subscibers to a group to change its charter? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Yah, agreed -- a better word is needed. Suggestions? "Flog" is good but probably not as well understood(?). --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does a framwork exist for the subscibers to a group to change its charter? —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | (...) against (...) not (...) "Offers," or "offerings" or both maybe, "lugnet.technic.offe...offerings" Just a suggestion. Rich -- Have Fun! C-Ya! Legoman34 ***** Legoman34 (Richard W. Schamus)... (No, I don't work for TLC, but I want to...) Card (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
