Subject:
|
Does a framwork exist for the subscibers to a group to change its charter?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:19:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3951 times
|
| |
|
|
Does a framework exist for the subscribers to a group to change its charter?
If it does not, should it?
Scott A
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:Fr1pMH.FtG@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > Reminder: lugnet.market.auction is the only lugnet newsgroup in which
> > > auction announcements or updates are appropriate. Please do not spam
> > > the theme-discussion groups with auction announcements. Thanks.
> > >
> > > http://www.lugnet.com/admin/terms/
> > >
> > > --Todd
> >
> >
> > DISCUSSION GROUP TERMS AND CONDITIONS
> > LUGNET includes discussion groups which allow feedback and
> > interaction between users. LUGNET and its owners and/or operators
> > do not control or censor messages, information, or files delivered
> > to discussion groups. It is a condition of your use of the
> > discussion groups that you do not:
> > <snipped 1 to 10>
> >
> > 11. Post auction announcements, updates, or listings in discussion
> > groups which do not explicitly welcome their presence.
> >
> > Well as one of the very few peole on LUGNet who both read and post to • this
> > group I have no problem with Yossi's post. Indeed, I explicitly welcome • its
> > presence. Furthermore, I'd argue that this post would be more welcome in
> > .duplo than .auction, where most of the readership is in search of Lego
> > System/Technic. Additionally, I think the same argument exists the clone
> > groups.
>
> All right, Scott...point taken.
>
> You've made it clear to me that #11 needs a clarification. I'll fix the
> Terms document and post a brief message about the text change.
>
> It was never the intention -- even in the remotest sense -- for "groups • which
> do not explicitly welcome" to be misinterpreted as "groups of people which • do
> not explicitly welcome." The word "group" there means "discussion group,"
> not "people group."
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
