 | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world? —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) Well, another idea would be just lugnet.castle.org, and split it when a 2nd group comes along. As far as name stability, how hard is it to move all the messages from one group to another (other than that it may break certain references - (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) As far as I'm aware, it's impossible to move a body of existing NNTP messages from one newsgroup to another group without completely destroying the normal functioning of the original group. --Todd (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) My thought was that if a while down the road, the name of Castle World was changed, and it became a problem with the newsgroup, it might not hurt to change the name of the newsgroup. Would it be possible to edit (automatically of course) all (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Oops (rereading what I wrote), I didn't mean to imply that a plain .castle.org group (with no .castleworld suffix) was a no-go because of that -- I was just answering the part about the feasability of moving messages. (...) Ya, that would (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
