 | | Suggestion for new feature —Ben Roller
|
| | | This is intended for you Todd, but I'm posting to see if other feel the same. Don't you hate it when you come to Lugnet and see a summary like "Re: This is the greatest day ever! (was: Free bricks for everyone!)" but you have no idea what the thread (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Suggestion for new feature —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) The original prototype for the new (May, 1999) interface did have a similar sort of feature via another symbol... Whereas the regular article is clicked up using a white and blue dot, this was a white and blue series of parallel lines... (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Suggestion for new feature —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) ^^^^^^^^ Wow, my first 3-character-gap dyslexic character swap! :-) I meant to say: "...but that was before the indented thread view..." --Todd (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Suggestion for new feature —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | (...) was (...) Now that makes the sentence clearer. :-) BTW, A "one step clickie" would be very nice. -Shiri (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Suggestion for new feature —Ben Roller
|
| | | | (...) Exactly, a one-step clickie path. I couldn't have said it better. :) It's not much of a time savings, but it seems a waste to load up the entire article just to click back to the root node articlet. I know that I do it several times per day, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
