Subject:
|
Re: Pre Auction Anouncment/Sale/Trade - Parts & Sets (8448 / 7171 / Pirates)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Feb 2000 17:14:21 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@newsguySAYNOTOSPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
616 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 09:43:39 GMT, "Scott-A"
<scott-arthur@eh105jb.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> I'd settle for being treated the same as anyone else. Forget justice and
> injustice, I'll settle for equality. Look at this post:
> http://www.lugnet.com/trains/?n=2553
> and then this one a few days later:
> http://www.lugnet.com/market/auction/?n=3205
> At the time I mailed him and toldhim of his error. No problem.
Wow. Those aren't just mistakes or carelessness, that first one is an
example of willful disregard. I woulda zapped him.
> BTW : Is the consensus that a "Pre-Auction Announcement/Sale/Trade" cross
> post is ok? Something like:
No. I don't see it as a cross-post issue. I see it as a
"announcement of intent to sell/trade" post to bst, with perhaps a
note that all items not sold/traded by such and such date will then be
auctioned.
THEN, on that date, I see a separate post _only_ to .auction where the
auction listing takes place.
> "I have items A, B & C which I intend to auction on DATE. Until then, they
> are available for sale/trade"
>
> Just wondering.
I think my way is a) nicer and b) less likely to look like announcing
an auction in bst.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
