Subject:
|
Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:57:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
256 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Paul Davidson writes:
> Personally, I find that using a USENET client (like Outlook Express, even)
> for Lugnet is far quicker and easier. Collapsable and expandable threads
> and all the other organization perks are built in that way.
Yeah, but its a major pain when the threads jump groups. I used to read using
Netscape Messenger, but it was too annoying, so I switched to the web
interface. The only problem I have now is figuring out where I was when I read
on different computers. :)
Jeff
>
> Shiri <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FoLxqC.1DL@lugnet.com...
> > Hi Todd, Suz and everyone else,
> >
> > I have a suggestion for the web interface. I've noticed lately that some
> > people are annoyed by threads that (In their opinion) don't fit in the
> > group. I've also noticed that when I come to a large, active group (say
> > .general or .castle) after even a day that I haven't read it, and I can't
> > seem to pick up reading where I left it.
> >
> > My suggestion, in a nutshell, is this:
> > Enable a "hide this thread" button, that will cause all the posts in the
> > thread and any future replies of it to "disappear". The "hiding" threads'
> > names will be written on the side somewhere (to the right of the posts in
> > the group, for example). If you want to see it again, all you have to do is
> > click on it (it's a link (?)) and the group page refreshes itself with the
> > thread reappearing.
> >
> > I don't know how easy/possible/hard/impossible that is, but I think it would
> > be nice...
> > Just my 2c...
> >
> > -Shiri
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads
|
| (...) read (...) Yeah, lucky for me, I only have one computer on the net ;-) (we have two other computers but we all want to work on this one ;-) But I still have problems whenever my Explorer breaks down (1) and I use Netscape instead - then I (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads
|
| (...) Yeah - I have a 15 year timeout on links, basically just so that I know what I've read! It's annoying when I switch between Linux and Win95 though, if my win partition wasn't drive-spaced then I'd try linking my linux history file, cookie file (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads
|
| Personally, I find that using a USENET client (like Outlook Express, even) for Lugnet is far quicker and easier. Collapsable and expandable threads and all the other organization perks are built in that way. -- Paul Davidson Shiri (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
