 | | Re: Todd, can we have an Arctic posting group? —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) I looked around a bit in the newsserver code last night and I was thinking of setting up a virtual newsgroup called _lugnet as a test case, and just filling it manually with some stuff, and seeing what happened with a few newsreaders. Before I (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Todd, can we have an Arctic posting group? —Matthew Miller
| | | | | | (...) "_" being a prefix for umbrella groups? Or is that just for testing? I still think I like the .general idea. It seems clean and logical to me. (I mean, why do we have lugnet.general instead of just posting into lugnet?) I don't think that (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Todd, can we have an Arctic posting group? —Jasper Janssen
| | | | | (...) Because of the "other parts of the system", is the prefix thing a necessary/near necessary step? (...) I don't think it should work like that. Less incentive to micro-classify threads. Jasper (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
