Subject:
|
Re: Tree branch broken ??
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Oct 1998 00:11:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
876 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpien@ctp.com> writes:
> Try this.. go here
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.announce:73
>
> then click on the box to the right of the star. This gives you:
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.announce:74
>
> a "does not exist" message. Is that followup in another group? Did it get
> cancelled? How did you know to put the URL in the tree? Don't do that! I
> TRUSTED that tree. :-)
>
> I bet it was Mike that cause this when he cancelled 74 and replaced it with...
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.general:136
Yes, that's what happened. Cancelled articles don't reflect into the DB of
refs. Pruning has to be done at runtime. I think trn uses ( ) to show
cancelled and expired articles, like this:
( )--( )--[1]+-( )--[1]
|-[1]--[1]
\-[1]
It wouldn't be difficult to check whether an article still exists and
display a non-link if it's gone.
> I think some thinking about the tree is in order. (and while you're at it, can
> you replace the squares with a LITTLE more context? I know asking for a whole
> indented list with times, authors, line counts, etc., is a bit much, but is
> there useful stuff you could display on a slightly bigger tree?... then make
> the tree fit in a scrollbox. Just kidding. About the second part.)
An indented text-based tree would be very easy to write (like the Netscape
built-in newsreader does) because the tree of articles is returned as an
object and there's just a display routine to dump it. But I really need to
focus on finishing up AucZILLA VII and getting the member stuff & houses
running...
I'll see tomorrow morning if I can do something additional for the
threading. It might only be 1/2 hour of work, whereas the other stuff
waiting is still quite a bit.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Tree branch broken ??
|
| (...) Well, just tell me to stop. :-) I've got the spare cycles (well, actually, I am blowing off working on an architecture doc so ME BAD) so I'm beating on the interface. I can break *anything*. Just ask our developers. ++Lar ======== Posted via (...) (26 years ago, 16-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Tree branch broken ??
|
| Try this.. go here (URL) click on the box to the right of the star. This gives you: (URL) "does not exist" message. Is that followup in another group? Did it get cancelled? How did you know to put the URL in the tree? Don't do that! I TRUSTED that (...) (26 years ago, 16-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
