 | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Mike Faunce
|
| | | Was this announcement/explanation ever posted? If so, I missed it. Mike Suzanne D. Rich <suz@media.mit.edu> wrote in message news:FMoD01.DE6@lugnet.com... (...) like (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | No, I'm sorry I haven't posted yet. I have been thinking long and hard about what I should/could say here. I think I should say as little as possible, so I will be brief. Sorry if my line breaks here are screwed up, Netscape bug. :-\ ---...--- The (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | (...) wow... that's pretty much *exactly* what i was asking to hear as all of this progressed... (not the specifics of your LEGO involvement, how could we have known?!?, but your knowledge of what *is* and *is not* going to be a problem for this (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | Thanks Suzanne. It's good to hear what your thinking about all of this. (...) This is an interesting point. Personally, I put my own interests above those of the Lego Company, and I think that's true for a lot of us here. That's not even a painful (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Or, "you're". *sigh*. (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
