 | | Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
|
|
(...) Of course, this isn't a good idea for something like the .dat group being discussed for the cad folks. I haven't looked into this, but can you customize the error message returned when a posting fails? That seems important if non-standard (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
|
|
(...) Cool. That's the way it should be. [snip] (...) :) Well, posters would still have to set a follow-up line. (...) I'm generally opposed to making things moderated, partly because it can generate a lot of work, and partly because I don't like (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
|
|
(...) LOL -- I was just popping back into this group having just realized the same...sure would suck if all the .DAT files were crossposted! :) (...) Yes, it's just a message to STDERR... The rejection messages for HTML postings versus (for example) (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
