 | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"?? —John Neal
|
| | | (...) *That* IMO would be a huge mistake. There's needs to be a public NG like RTL out there for the masses where they can swear, veer way off-topic, and go unchecked. For folks who are willing to abide by some simple rules of order and conduct, (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"?? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Well, I don't entirely disagree with Mark's opinions. I disagree with the words he used to express them, but not completely with their underlying "core." I do agree that it is, IMHO, somewhat unfortunate that theme-specific auctions are (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"?? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <382dfeff.238016940@...et.com>... (...) How about in a test theme or two allow auction announcements ONLY. Follow-ups must and updates would still have to go to lugnet.market.auction. Make it clear that it is an (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"?? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | (...) Ironically, #2 is the reason that I think they should be left out of the theme groups. Ben Roller (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"?? —Andrew Lynch
|
| | | | Another option, I suppose, would be to have sub-groups in each theme that are for sales purposes. I realize that this will muddy the neat structure somewhat, but it will allow someone to view sales and auctions that are specific to the themes that (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
