 | | slrn broken?
|
| Waaaugh!!! ARGH. slrn is chopping the Referneces line at 255 characters! BAD BAD BAD :-( :-( :-( WAY BAD BAD BAD Hmm, so what's up with this? Check this out below........ (I wrapped the References line here at 78 characters for readability.) From (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) Waitasecond! -- duh -- it's not slrn that's broken -- HEY MIKE! YOUR EDITOR IS BROKEN! --Todd (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) Aha! I KNEW there was a good reason he shouldn't be using Pico. :) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) slrn has been complaining about the references line, showing it as having a blank line within it, and I didn't know why. The only way I could get it to post a followup sometimes was to just delete the blank line AND the partial line following. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) Ok, tell me how to fix it. :) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) Hrmmm. Well, I've been doing it this way for over a week now and everyone seems to be getting my posts, so..... If you can give me a way to fix Pico (could it have something to do with me forcing it to wrap? doesn't seem to since the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) I'll take a look at it. I've played with other ways of moving the line back up whenever I have gotten the error, and one of them seemed to work without deleting a whole line of references, so I guess I'll have to wait and see if that fixes it. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: slrn broken?
|
| (...) Hmm, might have to upgrade to the latest version of Pico -- or, Hmm, it might still be broken in later versions...dunno. (...) Well, it's just reporting false reference information which makes for incorrect thread displays. --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Thread view!
|
| Wow, this thread tree thing at the bottom is perfect! What a cool way to show where you are and let you move around. Thanks, Todd. Of course it's context free but you can't have everything. (will this show as a reply to the "slrn broken" thread or (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread view!
|
| (...) Looks like it is showing up as a new thread with lots of references. (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread view!
|
| (...) Yeah, that's it. I'm mainly replying to this to try to generate the error I have dealt with before. Just checked the thread thing. I'm not sure it would be obvious to most people what it is, but it seemed obvious since I was looking for it. (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread view!
|
| (...) Righto -- it's the same thread (per se), but it's a new subject-line or sub-thread on the main thread. Threads, strictly speaking, are purely reference-defined. Free Agent has a conflibberjibbet for saying whether or not you want sub-threads (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
