 | | Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
|
|
(...) Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it. --Todd * The only group which has ever actually required DAT content is the obsolete lugnet.cad.dat group. (26 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:37bc7cfc.266795...net.com... (...) Could a group be designed to require DAT content to an initial post, but not to follow-ups? (Yes I realize this may be more trouble than it's worth, so please (...) (26 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
|
|
(...) Yeah. You mean like all of the .cad.dat.* sub-groups? That sounds like an excellent idea. (...) Not much trouble at all. --Todd (26 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
