 | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | (...) Aaah. now I see Like this: JW (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Richard Laing
|
| | | | | (...) I wonder if anyone else watching from the sidelines is finding this as absurd as I am? Insisting on how someone should sign their postings? (if at all). Any messages I get in Eudora clearly indicate who they are from before I even open them. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Heh. Well I think Bram might've been suggesting was more like this: --Jonathan When he said, "the same way you would sign a letter," he meant a written letter, not signing with letters. (I think. :-) --Todd (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) Well, either way, I think those two extra letters added quite a bit of meaning to the post. :) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Ryan Dennett
|
| | | | (...) writes: (...) posting from (...) If I'm (...) stopping you from (...) would sign a (...) this: (...) a written (...) Funny, Todd :-) I really don't think it matters which way he signs it; we know what JW means. :) Ryan "You have to stick to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
