Subject:
|
Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 21:02:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> > I'd ask the general question. Is a signature block mandatory? I think
> > not.
>
> Of course not. It's ridiculous to think that people should be forced
> to use a sig. Your name's in the header, both handle and real name if
> you use one. What possible reason could we as a community come up
> with to justify forcing anyone to use a sig?
>
> --
> The pieces you want and nothing else - easy online bidding!
> http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
> Sure, you could pay someone to run your LEGO auction.
> Or, you could run it yourself for free:
> http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/ (Still in beta)
I have also found the sig issue confusing. I used to use one, but the
people i send e-mail to all the time got sick of it very quickly, as did
I. And, I am too lazy to change it all the time. Besides, long rambling
sigs are more of an annoyance than anything, especially when editing and
replying. Lugnet makes it clear who is sending the message thus making
them unnecessary.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
| (...) Of course not. It's ridiculous to think that people should be forced to use a sig. Your name's in the header, both handle and real name if you use one. What possible reason could we as a community come up with to justify forcing anyone to use (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
