Subject:
|
Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:53:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
I agree with Larry P. on the signature issue - it IS nice to have, but I'm not
sure it's super-useful, at least when using the web interface to read LUGNET.
I ususally don't put a full signature on messages... just my name and sometimes
a comment.
On one list I'm on (choral directors) a signature is required because not all
e-mail readers capture complete header information....
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
| (...) I'm not sure I buy this. What value, exactly, does a signature bring? It seems decorative, and the value is mostly to the appender being able to make: (...) political statements or statements about their belief systems (...) more information (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
