 | | cascading vote choices (was: Re: i admit i was wrong) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) I don't think that follows. It certainly wasn't specified in the CFV that the votes would be interpreted in a cascading way. Note that (a) says "All lugnet.* groups," it doesn't say, "As many lugnet.* groups as possible," and it doesn't say (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: cascading vote choices (was: Re: i admit i was wrong) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) For what it's worth, I voted thinking that it I voted for complete removal of priveleges, I was, by definition, also voting for removal from .cad.*. Now I'm beginning to think it should have been a ban/not ban vote, not a multi-tiered (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: cascading vote choices (was: Re: i admit i was wrong) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) That's why I'm not voting. (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: cascading vote choices (was: Re: i admit i was wrong) —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | But those of us most involved with LCAD consider your opinions important. We want to encourage greater participation from new and "marginal" members. If JW's posts are driving such people away, that's just as important a consideration as the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: cascading vote choices (was: Re: i admit i was wrong) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Thanks. I'll post my opinions (I prefer the "mentor" solution). But LCAD really isn't something of interest to me (sorry!), and I wouldn't really participate in the group no matter what the climate. (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
