Subject:
|
cascading vote choices (was: Re: i admit i was wrong)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 23:09:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
87 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> writes:
> I think Tim was envisioning a single multiple-choice vote, i.e. pick a) do
> nothing, b) remove from lugnet.cad*, c) remove from lugnet.*. In that case,
> those votes for "c" could also be considered votes for "b".
I don't think that follows. It certainly wasn't specified in the CFV that
the votes would be interpreted in a cascading way. Note that (a) says "All
lugnet.* groups," it doesn't say, "As many lugnet.* groups as possible," and
it doesn't say that a vote for (a) implies a vote for (b) as well.
What do you do about someone who expected they were casting a vote in favor
of all or nothing? (That is, only a complete ban and not a partial ban.)
The only way that (a) can cascade into (b) without subjective interpretation
is if (a) comes out to be 2/3 or greater and renders (b) moot, right?
> If 60% say remove
> from lugnet.*, and 10% say remove from lugnet.cad.*, then you have a 70%
> super-majority for removing from lugnet.cad.*.
That's one possible interpretation.
Another interpretation -- the literalist interpretation, which is how I
would definitely interpret it -- is that 60% want either complete removal or
no removal at all. That was the question as literally written.
As Larry pointed out,
http://www.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=2672
it would be "more straightforward to present a series of up/down
propositions and commentary that the broader ones will supercede the
narrower ones if passed."
At this point, if people are considering a and b to be mutually exclusive,
I just hope it turns out either that a>2/3 or that a+b<2/3.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) I think Tim was envisioning a single multiple-choice vote, i.e. pick a) do nothing, b) remove from lugnet.cad*, c) remove from lugnet.*. In that case, those votes for "c" could also be considered votes for "b". If 60% say remove from lugnet.*, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
