Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:53:00 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.comAVOIDSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
956 times
|
| |
|
|
dkrenz wrote:
>
> Mike Stanley wrote:
> > I care. I was born in 69. I'd like 69.
> >
> > Whatever scheme you adopt that allows me to get 69 would be good.
I suspect a lot of us feel that way. But about ourselves. I already said
I want #2, though.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| Forget that, I want the highest possible number. 32767? 65536? 4294967296? No I got it: 31337! How about rank by number of website hits, or GB of data transfer? KL (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
