Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 02:21:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4934 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
>
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> >
> > Any opinions on how LUGNET member #'s should be allocated/assigned?
> >
> > All of this, of course, assumes that people actually -care- what number
> > they happen to wind up with, and that they might prefer lower numbers
> > over larger numbers...and this might not be universally the case.
> >
> > Does anyone care? The #'s will be lifetime-lasting.
>
> I care. I was born in 69. I'd like 69.
>
> Whatever scheme you adopt that allows me to get 69 would be good. I'm
> sure everyone would agree.
Oh, absolutely ;-)
22(1)
(1)Julie - born on the 22nd of Dec.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
